Reliability and feasibility of centralized monitoring approach in source data verification during clinical trials
Abstract
As per ICH GCP, monitoring can be defined as “The act of overseeing the progress of a clinical trial, and of ensuring that it is conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with the protocol, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), Good Clinical Practice (GCP), and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).” Clinical experiments are important for deeper understanding of how interventions work in humans. The aim of the monitoring of the clinical trial is to avoid errors that may compromise patient safety and results of the trial and enables more frequent monitoring of the integrity of the trial and could improve safety concerns by detecting errors earlier than expected. Risk-based monitoring in clinical trials is the process of identification, assessment, monitoring and mitigation of risks that could affect the quality or safety of a study. Centralized monitoring has a direct impact on the clinical trials. One of the most basic and fundamental need of centralized monitoring is to avoid the repetition in clinical trials, saving both time and Money. Central monitoring greatly influences the Patient safety, data integrity and monitoring costs in a clinical trial. This helps in increasing the effectiveness of the monitoring process reducing the burden on the sponsor. The basic and fundamental priority of a clinical trial is to ensure the safety and well-being of the subject. In this article, we will be focusing on how Centralized monitoring can increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the monitoring process and source data verification (SDV) in clinical trials with a special emphasis on Risk based monitoring (RBM).
Downloads
References
2. Food and Drug Administration, ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice Consolidated Guidance. Rockville, MD: FDA; 1996.
3. Lauren H, Yasmine P, Allison M. Assessing data quality and the variability of source data verification auditing methods in clinical research settings. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2018; 83: 25-32.
4. Sheetz N., Wilson B., Benedict J., et al. Evaluating source data verification as a quality control measure in clinical trials. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2014; 48(6): 671–680.
5. Mitchel J.T., Kim YJ., Choi J., et al. Evaluation of data entry errors and data changes to an electronic data capture clinical trial database. Drug Information Journal. 2011; 45(4): 421-230.
6. Mealer M., Kittelson J., Thompson B.T., et al. Remote source data verification in two national clinical trials network: A pilot study. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11): 1-6.
7. Adam B, Vadim T, Fernand L. The Basics of Clinical Trial Centralized Monitoring. Applied clinical trials. 2018; 27(11): 1-14.
8. Agrafiotis D.K., Lobanov V.S., Farnum M.A. Risk-Based Monitoring of Clinical Trials: An Integrative Approach. Clinical therapeutics. 2018; 40(11): 1204-1212.
9. McNamara C., Engelhardt N., Potter W., et al. Risk-Based Data Monitoring: Quality Control in Central Nervous System (CNS) Clinical Trials. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2019; 53(2): 176-182.
10. Yamada O., Chiu S-W., Takata M., et al. Clinical trial monitoring effectiveness: Remote risk-based monitoring versus on-site monitoring with 100% source data verification. Clinical trials. 2020: 1-10
11. Molloy S., Henley P. Monitoring clinical trials: a practical guide. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2016; 21:1602–11.
12. Beever, D., & Swaby, L. An evaluation of risk-based monitoring in pragmatic trials in UK Clinical Trials Units. Trials.2019; 20(1):1-7.
13. Andersen, J. R., Byrjalsen, I., Bihlet, A., et al. Impact of source data verification on data quality in clinical trials: an empirical post hoc analysis of three phase 3 randomized clinical trials. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2015; 79(4): 660–668.
14. Bakobaki J.M., Rauchenberger M., Joffe N., et al. The potential for central monitoring techniques to replace on-site monitoring: findings from an international multi-centre clinical trial. Clin Trials. 2012; 9(2):257–264.
15. Tantsyura, V., Grimes, I., Mitchel, J., et al. Risk-Based Source Data Verification Approaches: Pros and Cons. Drug Information Journal, 44(6), 745–756.
16. Shukla B.K., Khan M.S., Nayak V., Barriers, Adoption, Technology, Impact and Benefits of Risk Based Monitoring. International Journal of Clinical Trials. 2016; 3(1); 9-14.
17. Guidance for Industry: Oversight of Clinical Investigations - A Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available from: URL: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/oversight-clinical-investigations-risk-based-approach-monitoring.
18. Edwards. P., Shakur. H., Barnetson L., et al. Central and statistical data monitoring in the Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage (CRASH-2) trial. Clinical Trials. 2014; 11(3):336–343.
19. Tudur Smith. C., Stocken D.D., Dunn. J., et al. The value of source data verification in a cancer clinical trial. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12), e51623.
20. Mitchel. J., Kim. Y., Hamrell. M., et al. Time to change the clinical trial monitoring paradigm. Appl Clin Trials. Available from: URL: https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/time-change-clinical-trial-monitoring-paradigm.
21. Olsen, R., Bihlet, A. R., Kalakou, F., et al. The impact of clinical trial monitoring approaches on data integrity and cost—a review of current literature. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2016; 72(4), 399–412.
22. Nielsen. E., Hyder. D., Deng C. A data-driven approach to risk based source data verification. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science. 2014; 48(2):173-180.
23. Pronker. E, Geerts B.F., Cohen A., et al. Improving the quality of drug research or simply increasing its cost? An evidence-based study of the cost for data monitoring in clinical trials. British Journal Clinical Pharmacology. 2104; 71(3):467–470.
24. Scannell J.W., Blanckley. A., Boldon. H., et al. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2012; 11(3):191–200.
25. Journot V., Perusat-Villetorte S., Bouyssou C., et al. Remote pre-enrollment checking of consent forms to reduce non-conformity. Clinical Trials. 2013; 10(3):449–459.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.